PAOC Spotlights

Third Annual Meeting of the Ozone and Climate Project

Wed July 27th, 2016
Lauren Hinkel

On June 7-8th, 2016, oceanographers, marine biogeochemists, atmospheric scientists and climatologists from across the world converged on MIT for the third annual meeting of the Ozone and Climate Project.

Response of Climate to Antarctic Ozone HoleThe five-year project aims to understand the Antarctic ozone hole’s impact on Antarctica and the Southern Ocean, and its importance in the global picture of climate change. Overall, researchers agree that this region plays a key role in heat and carbon exchange between the atmosphere and ocean. Here, the ocean upwells cold, carbon-rich water from the deep, as well as takes up heat and CO2 from the atmosphere. But it is still unclear how the ozone hole has perturbed these processes. This study, funded by the NSF’s Frontiers in Earth System Dynamics program (FESD), explores—through observations, theory and modeling—the climate system’s response to ozone depletion and how it has adjusted as the Earth’s protective stratospheric layer heals.

This year, thirty select project members and invited guests led informal and open discussions with the goal of exploring two primary questions: What are the climate impacts of stratospheric ozone depletion and recovery over the Antarctic? And, what are the indicators and mechanisms of these impacts within this atmosphere-ocean-ice-carbon system?

The group organized the discussion around three main themes:

  1. How does interactive chemistry modify coupling between the stratospheric vortex and the rest of the climate system?
  2. How are ocean circulation, ice cover, heat and carbon uptake and biogeochemistry impacted by the ozone hole?
  3. How does the ozone hole impact global climate and what are the observable indicators?

Susan Solomon, John Marshall, Ryan Abernathey look on as Irina Marinov speaks. (Photo: Lauren Hinkel)Project investigator and MIT Atmospheric Chemist Susan Solomon recently led a study documenting the Montreal Protocol’s efficacy in curtailing the emission of ozone-destroying chemicals, which is helping to heal the ozone hole. Indeed, “the view out there [with the public] is that the ozone hole problem has been solved,” said John Marshall, the project’s principle investigator and an MIT oceanographer. “But we’re learning a lot about the climate system by observing how it adjusts to the healing of the ozone hole. So I think that’s an important thing to bring out and the other big context is: What’s going on around Antarctica in general?”

Many of the researchers in attendance like Solomon, Darryn Waugh and Lorenzo Polvani have been working together on this and similar ozone issues for decades, so there was a healthy dialogue amongst them. One topic that kept being raised during the conference was the need to “get ozone right” in the models i.e. the correct atmospheric response to changes in its concentration and location. “Ozone is a tough thing to deal with in the climate models. A distribution can be prescribed from data for recent years, but we have limited observations prior to 1986,” said Solomon. As the ozone hole develops, the polar vortex cools and strengthens, causing dynamical changes in the stratosphere like SAM (Southern Annual Mode, which helps to drive the strength and position of the Westerly winds circling around Antarctica) and the Jetstream position and strength. But as Solomon explained during the conference, the polar vortex moves around, which isn’t simulated in a couple of the frequently-used models, but, “simply prescribing ozone from data, whether zonally averaged or not, means that the polar vortex in the model will not be in the same place as the polar vortex as the data.” While there is the option to incorporate interactive chemistry into the models, so that everything’s consistent, there are cost and time trade-offs. “It’s an ongoing question how much of a problem that is, and what to do about it,” she said.

A panel discussion. From left: Irina Marinov, Darryn Waugh, Will Sevior, Aditi Sheshadri, Gabriel Chiodo, John Marshall, Matt England, Doug Kinnison, Susan Solomon. (Photo: Lauren Hinkel)

Other members like Marshall and Yavor Kostov, a postdoc at Oxford and recent MIT PhD graduate, were among several those whose work addressed the ocean-sea ice relationship in the context of ozone forcing. Kostov proposed that under ozone depletion and an increase in SAM with its associated winds, ocean surface temperatures cool, which could be responsible for sea ice expansion around Antarctica, in general. Some, like Marika Holland of NCAR, emphasized the importance of specific regions, such as ice cover in the Ross Sea.

Another area of research that the group is contributing to is heat and carbon uptake as well as biogeochemical impacts in the Antarctic region that could be affected by the ozone hole. Groups from Johns Hopkins, the University of Reading, CU-Boulder and MIT, in particular, focused on these aspects. One of the questions addressed was whether the Southern Ocean is a sink of anthropogenic carbon or not. Jon Lauderdale, an MIT postdoc in oceanography, spoke about how one quantifies competing mechanisms that affect air-sea carbon fluxes. Some investigators have found that the strength of this sink may have been weakening, but is now recovering. This may be due to effects from the ozone hole or potentially natural variability. However, several presentations like Anand Gnanadesikan’s, Nikki Lovenduski’s and David Ferreira’s, showed that the ozone hole had little net impact on carbon uptake.

Take-Aways and Final Impressions:

Researchers on panel 2 field questions. From left: Tom Haine, David Ferreira, Ryan Abernathy, Jon Lauderdale,  Nikki Lovenduski and Jordan Thomas (Photo: Lauren Hinkel)Discussions throughout the FESD conference were lively and, while there is still much research left to do, many felt optimistic for the future of research surrounding the ozone hole and the Antarctic region. “I think it’s a really exciting time to be in Southern Ocean science because you’ve got high-powered models, that are getting better and are free,” Lauderdale said. “Free, meaning, you’re actually simulating the things you want to simulate, rather than parameterizing or imposing them, like interactive chemistry and the biogeochemical cycles.” Additionally, more ARGO floats are coming online with abilities for biogeochemical sensing and floats that can stay under the sea ice, getting readings in areas and seasons that were previously unattainable. “We’re just collecting so much more data, so much more regularly and with more extensive coverage in unusual places. [With this], I think we’ll get a very good idea for what the baseline is,” he said.

MIT’s Susan Solomon was encouraged by the progress made by the project, and plans to incorporate some of the issues raised by Ozone and Climate Project attendees into her own future research. “I thought the workshop was very stimulating—lots of diverse ideas from people at a range of institutions always bring out the best in science.”

See here for more photos.



Theme A: How well do we understand ozone forcing and its drivers?

Doug Kinnison(NCAR): Polar ozone depletion and trends

Susan Solomon(MIT): The "remarkable" record-large Antarctic ozone hole in 2015

Aditi Sheshadri(Columbia): Propagating annular modes

Gabriel Chiodo(Columbia): Large radiative forcing due to ozone depletion offset by albedo over Antarctica

Darryn Waugh(JHU): Robustness of the simulated tropospheric response to ozone depletion

Panel 3 discusses the third theme. (Photo: John Marshall)Theme B: How are ocean circulation, ice cover, heat and carbon uptake and bio-geochemistry impacted by the ozone hole?

Matthew England(UNSW): Imprint of the Southern Annular Mode on the coupled ocean-atmosphere-ice system

Will Seviour(JHU): The transient response of the Southern Ocean to ozone depletion in GFDL ESM2M

John Marshall, Maxwell Kelley, Anastasia Romanouand Yavor Kostov(MIT, GISS): Rationalizing the SST and sea-ice response of coupled climate models to Antarctic ozone loss.

Irina Marinov(UPenn): Southern Ocean deep convection and teleconnections

Theme B (cont'd) Southern Ocean circulation, ice cover, heat and carbon uptake

Anirban Sinha(Columbia): The timescales of Southern Ocean eddy equilibration

Ryan Abernathey(Columbia): Water Mass Transformation Under Southern Ocean Sea Ice.

Arnaud Czaja(Imperial College): Decoupling of oceanic and atmospheric heat transports over the ACC

Tom Haine(JHU): Thermobaricity in the transition zones between alpha and beta oceans.

Anand Gnanadesikan(JHU): Southern ocean biogeochemistry in a changing climate.

Jordan Thomas(JHU): Ocean Carbon and Heat Variability in an Earth System Model

David Ferreira(U Reading): Climate response functions for carbon

Jon Lauderdale(MIT): A new framework for quantifying drivers of Southern Ocean air-sea carbon fluxes.

Nikki Lovenduski,L. Polvaniand A. Solomon (CU-Boulder, Columbia): The impact of the ozone hole on Southern Ocean carbon uptake

Attendees of the third annual meeting of the Ozone and Climate Project (Image: John Marshall)

Theme C: Can we attribute the impacts of the ozone hole on global climate and identify observable indicators?

Cecelia Bitz(UW): The Hydroclimate Response to Westerly Wind Enhancement

Larry Horowitz(GFDL): Impacts of historical ozone changes on climate in GFDL-CM3

Lorenzo Polvani(Columbia): The dominant role of natural variability on Antarctic temperature trends, as revealed by their spatial patterns

Ari Solomon (Columbia): Highly predictable responses of the mid-latitude jet in the Southern Hemisphere

Sarah Gille(Scripps): Long-term warming trends in the Southern Ocean

John Fyfe(ECCC): Attribution of Southern Ocean warming trends to ozone, aerosol and greenhouse gas forcing

Yavor Kostov(Oxford University/MIT): Interpreting the historical Southern Ocean SST trends in models and observations.

Marika Holland(NCAR): The influence of winds on Ross Sea ice cover: Seasonal lags and explained trends.

Gavin Schmidtand Katherine Marvel(GISS): Insights from single forcing ensembles on SH variability and forced response

Mark England(Columbia): The impact of stratospheric ozone depletion on the Amundsen Sea Low